Cost Recovery

Cost recovery is the part of a data request programme most likely to be sitting unused. The legal entitlement is well established; the operational capacity to exercise it usually is not.

The statutory basis

Section 2706 provides that a governmental entity obtaining information under the relevant provisions shall pay the provider a fee for reasonable reimbursement of costs directly incurred in searching for, assembling, reproducing, or otherwise providing the information. The amount is as agreed between the parties, or as determined by a court where they disagree.

Exceptions apply, and the significant one for many providers concerns certain records of a provider’s own subscribers or customers sought by a government entity. Whether a given request is recoverable turns on its type and the records sought, so the analysis is per-request rather than global.

Why entitlement does not translate into recovery

What the statute allowsWhat most programmes can do

The obstacle is measurement. An invoice has to be substantiated, and substantiation requires knowing what a specific request actually cost. Teams handling requests through shared inboxes and ad hoc workflows have no per-request record of effort, so there is nothing to bill from. The entitlement is not disputed; it is simply unexercised.

What a recoverable programme needs

  • Per-request time capture. Not estimates after the fact, but recorded effort at each stage.
  • A defensible rate basis. Loaded cost of the roles doing the work, applied consistently.
  • A record of what was done. Searches run, records reviewed, volume produced.
  • A billing route. Agencies have processes for paying these invoices, and someone has to own submitting them.

Why it matters beyond the money

Cost recovery is often the mechanism by which a data request programme gets funded rather than tolerated. Legal and trust & safety teams handling growing request volumes usually compete for headcount against functions with clearer revenue stories. A programme that recovers its own costs changes that conversation, and the tracking that makes recovery possible is the same tracking that makes volume, response time, and staffing needs visible in the first place.

Frequently asked questions

Are companies entitled to be paid for responding to legal process?

In the United States, 18 U.S.C. § 2706 provides for reasonable reimbursement of costs directly incurred in searching for, assembling, reproducing, and otherwise providing the data. There are exceptions, notably for certain records of a provider’s own subscribers sought by a government entity, so what is recoverable depends on the request type.

Why do so few providers claim it?

Because claiming requires per-request cost tracking that most programmes do not have. If nobody records how long a request took and what it involved, there is no basis to invoice. The entitlement goes unused not because it is contested but because the underlying data was never captured.

What costs are recoverable?

Costs directly incurred in responding: staff time searching for and assembling records, reproduction, and the mechanics of delivery. General overhead and the cost of building a compliance function are ordinarily not recoverable, since they are not attributable to a specific request.

See what
we can do
for you.

Request a demo