Pen Register and Trap and Trace

Pen register and trap and trace orders are the surveillance instruments most often misunderstood by recipients, because they impose an ongoing obligation rather than a one-time production. Answering one is not a task you close; it is a capability you have to operate.

What they capture

The terms are historical, from telephone-era devices. In modern practice both refer to real-time collection of non-content addressing data:

  • Pen register: outgoing addressing information from a target account.
  • Trap and trace: incoming addressing information to a target account.

In both cases the statute is explicit that the information captured must not include the contents of any communication. The line between addressing data and content is not always crisp in modern protocols, and that ambiguity is where most of the legal argument lives.

The standard, and why it is low

Pen/trap orderWiretap order
What it capturesAddressing informationCommunication content
StandardCertification of relevanceProbable cause, plus necessity
Judicial weighing of factsMinimalSubstantial
Typical duration60 days30 days, renewable
Notice to the targetGenerally delayed or noneRequired after the fact

The certification standard means the judge’s role is closer to confirming the application was properly made than to independently assessing whether the intrusion is justified. That design reflects a judgement, made decades ago, that addressing data is meaningfully less sensitive than content, a judgement considerably more contested now than when it was made, given how much can be inferred from communication patterns alone.

What it means for a company receiving one

  • Understand it is ongoing. The obligation runs for the order’s duration and needs an owner, a mechanism, and an end date.
  • Scope the capture to addressing data. Where a protocol blurs the line, err toward the narrower reading and raise the ambiguity rather than over-collecting.
  • Diarise the expiry. Collection must stop when the order lapses. Continuing past expiry is unauthorised interception.
  • Check for an accompanying non-disclosure order. These are typically paired.

Frequently asked questions

How is a pen/trap order different from a wiretap?

A pen/trap captures addressing information: who contacted whom, and when. A wiretap captures the content of the communication itself. Because content is far more intrusive, wiretap orders require a much higher showing, including probable cause and a demonstration that other investigative methods have failed.

What standard does a pen/trap order require?

It is a certification standard rather than a factual showing. The applicant certifies that the information likely to be obtained is relevant to an ongoing criminal investigation, and the court issues the order on that certification. The judge does not independently weigh the evidence the way probable cause requires.

Is a pen/trap order prospective or retrospective?

Prospective. It authorises capturing addressing information going forward, generally for up to 60 days with extensions available. Historical records of past communications are obtained through a subpoena, a 2703(d) order, or a warrant instead.

See what
we can do
for you.

Request a demo