Preservation Request

The preservation request is the quietest instrument in the set and the one most often mishandled, because it looks like a data request and is not one.

What a preservation request does

It stops the clock. Providers delete data on a schedule; investigations move slower than deletion cycles. A preservation request bridges that gap by requiring the company to set aside a copy of specified records while the requesting agency assembles the legal process needed to actually obtain them.

The mechanics under § 2703(f):

  • The request can be made by any governmental entity, informally, without a court order.
  • The obligation is to retain, for 90 days, renewable once for a further 90.
  • Nothing is disclosed. Disclosure requires a subpoena, a court order, or a warrant, arriving separately.

Why it matters that preservation is not disclosure

Preservation requestEmergency disclosure request
What it compelsRetention of recordsNothing; it is voluntary
Is data handed overNoYes, if the company agrees
Judicial reviewNone requiredNone
Risk if wrongly honouredLow; data is only heldHigh; data leaves the company
Appropriate response to an unverified urgent requestOften yesOnly after verification

That last row is the practically useful one. When an urgent request arrives and the requester cannot be verified quickly, preserving the data is very often the correct answer. It protects the evidence against deletion, costs the investigation nothing, and discloses nothing to someone who may not be who they claim. A company that reflexively treats preservation as the safe interim step removes most of the pressure that makes fraudulent emergency requests work.

What it means for a company receiving one

  • Classify it correctly at intake. A preservation request routed as a disclosure request wastes review effort and risks over-disclosure.
  • Actually preserve. The obligation is real, and ordinary automated deletion will breach it unless a hold is applied.
  • Track the expiry. Preservation obligations lapse. Holding data indefinitely because nobody closed the ticket is its own compliance problem, particularly under data minimisation obligations.
  • Expect follow-on process. A preservation request usually means a subpoena, order, or warrant is being prepared.

The two are cousins but not the same. A legal hold is an internal obligation that arises when litigation is reasonably anticipated, and it is imposed by the company on itself. A preservation request is external, arrives from a government agency, and covers records identified by that agency. They can and often do overlap on the same data, and both suspend ordinary deletion.

Frequently asked questions

Does a preservation request mean handing over data?

No, and this is the most important thing about it. A preservation request compels retention only. The company freezes a copy of the specified records so they survive normal deletion cycles, and discloses nothing until separate legal process arrives. Confusing preservation with disclosure is a common and costly intake error.

How long does a preservation obligation last?

Under 18 U.S.C. § 2703(f) records must be retained for 90 days, and the government may renew for one additional 90-day period. If no legal process arrives by the time the obligation expires, the data returns to the company’s ordinary retention policy.

Can a company notify a user about a preservation request?

Section 2703(f) does not itself prohibit notice, unlike a non-disclosure order. Whether to notify is generally a policy decision, though a preservation request is frequently a signal that compulsory process and an accompanying gag order are coming.

See what
we can do
for you.

Request a demo